As the founder and CEO of Index Fund Advisors (IFA.com), a registered investment adviser and wealth management firm celebrating its 25th anniversary in March 2024, I was astonished to learn that the Dow Jones Industrial Average should have been closer to 100,000 when including dividends, rather than the value of around 38,000 in March 2024. Similarly, the S&P 500 should have been at approximately 25,000 instead of the 5,000 it was in March 2024. The S&P 500 25,000 index value assumes a total return index inception date of 1970. See table below which updates to the current index values every day.
This discrepancy is due to most major indexes globally being price-only indexes and not accounting for additional returns earned by investors through dividends. For instance, Germany's DAX has been a total return index since Dec. 1987 and provides an accurate reflection of an investor's total return. DAX calls it a performance index versus a price index.
The impact of this omission is significant; dividends would have increased reported price-only index returns by an estimated annualized return of between two and three percent per year, or approximately twice the cumulative return, over the last quarter-century.
Therefore, I urge global financial media providers to switch their reporting practices and begin reflecting total return index values starting January 1st, 2026 or sooner. This change should encompass all major indexes worldwide so that investors can be better educated and make more informed decisions of current and historical returns of the companies in the index, based on accurate performance data.
Please sign this petition if you believe in transparency in financial reporting and want global financial media providers to report total return index values no later than January 1, 2026.
Samuel M. Hartzmark and David H. Solomon
NBER Working Paper No. 27380
June 2020
ABSTRACT Investors' perception of performance is biased because the relevant measure, returns, is rarely displayed. Major indices ignore dividends thereby underreporting market performance. Newspapers are more pessimistic on ex-dividend days, consistent with mistaking the index for returns. Market betas should track returns, but track prices more than dividends, creating predictable returns. Mutual funds receive inflows for “beating the S&P 500,” price index based on net asset value (also not a return). Investors extrapolate market indices, not returns, when forming annual performance expectations. Displaying returns by default would ameliorate these issues, which arise despite high attention and agreement on the appropriate measure.
Price Only vs Total Return discussions at 1:03:33 and 1:15:00.
Ben Felix: How does reference to price-only data affect the media's coverage of the market?
Sam Hartzmark: What's interesting about a price index is that it is predictably and systematically wrong based on how high dividends are that day. That Miller and Modigliani idea of the price dropping by the amount of the dividend that works for firms, it holds for the market. Let's say that the market is paying a dividend yield today of 1%. That means that if you were looking at the total return index, that number you were looking at would be 1% higher than a day with no dividend. Because you should be looking at it, you're looking at the wrong number. What we show in our papers, we look at New York Times media coverage of the market and we say, well, what is the media coverage reflecting? Is it reflecting the actual market performance, the total return? Or is it the fact that reporters are looking at the number that's blaring right out in front of them? Because, again, none of this is secret. The real number is there, but what we find is that financial coverage is significantly more negative, the higher the dividend yield is, controlling for the actual level of performance, which intuitively makes sense. You're looking at the wrong number, you're responding to the wrong number. That's what coverage is actually responding to.
Paper reference in this interview: Hartzmark, Samuel M. and Solomon, David H., Reconsidering Returns (2020).
Agrrawal, Pankaj and Borgman, Richard
Journal of Behavioral Finance
ISSN: 1542-7579
Volume: 11, Issue: 4
Publisher: Taylor & Francis
London 2010
ABSTRACT This paper brings to light and discusses a systemic issue in the calculation and display of relative return information as currently seen on some of the most prominent finance websites; income-generating events such as dividends and interest are not included in relative return calculations and all comparative return graphics. The resulting ranking of the securities, based on such incomplete returns, is essentially meaningless from a total return perspective, yet they are being served to millions of investors every day. This could lead to the formation of a possible availability heuristic and an optical bias against fixed-income and other income generating assets. This problem has gone unnoticed for many years with no discussion of the topic either in the academic or practitioner press. The ready availability of such unclear or inaccurate information from sources generally perceived to be credible can, in this age of do-it-yourself portfolio management, have serious and damaging financial consequences to the unsuspecting investor. The paper also shows the effect of this return differential on the calculation of the asset correlation matrices and the subsequent effect on the resulting asset-weight vectors that are used to generate Markowitz style mean-variance portfolios. The visual discrepancies are then supported by the application of the Gibbons, Ross and Shanken [1989] W-test for portfolio efficiency. The authors' proposed correction, based on elementary finance, fixes the problem.
The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) has a Rule 5330 (5330. Adjustment of Ordersfinra.org) that requires broker-dealers to be fair to buyers by adjusting the price overnight downward by the amount of the dividend to be paid BECAUSE, as of that morning, the new buyers will no longer get the dividend. Therefore, the price they pay should be reduced by the dollar amount of the dividend. Here are the key points of the rule:
Ex-Dividend, Ex-Rights, Ex-Distribution, and Ex-Interest (Ex refers to Excluding): When a security is quoted ex-dividend, ex-rights, ex-distribution, or ex-interest, broker-dealers must adjust open orders accordingly.
The adjustment involves reducing, increasing, or adjusting the price and/or number of shares of the order.
For Cash Dividends: ...Open order prices are first reduced by the dollar amount of the dividend...
Adherence to Rule 5330 by broker-dealers ensures fair treatment of investors and maintains market integrity.
There are 3 dates important for dividends:
Here is an example of how it works:
Because FINRA requires broker-dealers to reduce the daily opening price for buyers who won't get a dividend, they should also require the media to display an index that adds back that dividend on the day the price was reduced. Instead, the media shows a price-only index that declines when dividends are paid by the amount of those dividends, which is a wrong measure of total performance since the investor did received dividend and that dividend is a component of their total return.
Data Details: Detailed S&P 500 return data broken down into price, dividend, and total returns by year. The price return represents the return generated by price changes in the S&P 500 index. The return from reinvesting dividends distributed by the companies in the index is labeled as the dividend return. Total return is the sum of the price return and dividend return.
Source: https://www.slickcharts.com/sp500/returns/details, captured on 2025-01-23"Dividends are vital. Over the long run, the compounding effect of reinvesting dividends makes a huge difference to returns. In the past half-century, U.S. stocks turned $100 into $6,200 without dividends (ignoring costs and taxes) while with dividends they would be worth $25,000. The same is true in Japan, where the 2% yield from dividends is now much higher than in the U.S. An investor who made the dire decision to buy at the top of the bubble and reinvest dividends made back all losses by March 2021. Somehow we forgot to hold a party."
DJIA TR | 105,491.57 | 963.60 | 0.92% |
S&P 500 TR | 12,495.74 | 133.59 | 1.08% |
NASDAQ TR | 21,720.24 | 302.17 | 1.41% |
Russell 2000® TR | 11,289.50 | 174.43 | 1.57% |